The petitioner, Illinois Attorney General Lisa Madigan, argued that the ADEA is the exclusive remedy for age discrimination claims
This case concerns whether the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA) applies to state and local government entities with fewer than twenty employees. The brief makes a number of compelling arguments in favor of upholding the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruling that the ADEA covers the entities in question
Mt. Lemmon v. Guido_US SC_AARP NELA Amicus Brief_071218.pdf
The question presented in Coleman is "whether Congress constitutionally abrogated states' Eleventh Amendment immunity when it passed the self-care leave provision of the Family and Medical Leave Act."
NELAAmicus_Coleman_09 27 11.pdf
Introduced In Senate EEOC Issues ADEA Disparate Impact Final Regulations NELA Participates In Stakeholder Meeting With MSPB House Education And Labor Workforce Protections Subcommittee Holds Hearing On DOL Proposed Rules For Homecare Workers Representative Andrews Introduces Bill To Exclude From Title 9 Forced Arbitration In Employment Contracts & Disputes Maryland Legislature Proposes Its Own Civil Rights Tax Relief Act Judicial Nominations: Senator Reid Files Cloture Vote On District Court Nominations, Strikes Deal With Mitch McConnell NELA Members Volunteer As Spokespeople On Judicial Vacancy Crisis #LegislativePublicPolicy #DOL #Newsletter #MSPB #EEOC #JudicialNominations #AgeDiscrimination #ForcedArbitration #CJTFA #ADEA #Gross
OTH_03_2012.pdf
NELA and The Institute joined the Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights and the National Women’s Law Center in signing on to this brief, which addresses the standard for federal sector employees to prove age discrimination in violation of the ADEA. Dr. Noris Babb was employed by the U.S
Final Babb v. Wilkie Amicus Brief (9.25.2019).pdf
Moreover, an adverse ruling in this case could affect the other statutes that use the FLSA’s collective action procedures, such as the Age Discrimination in Employment Act and the Equal Pay Act. #WageHour #ADEA #USSupremeCourt #ClassandCollectiveActions #Amicus #FLSA
11-1059 bsac NELA.pdf
We stated that "[t]he Court's majority eviscerates decades of jurisprudence by suggesting that highly subjective decision-making systems, such as those at Wal-Mart, are immune from scrutiny in cases involving multiple facilities
NELA Testimony_Barriers to Justice Hearing_Final_062711.pdf
Author Professor Eric Schnapper (WA) #ADEA #Amicus #AgeDiscrimination #TitleVII
NELA Amicus_HosannaTabor.pdf
CLE Online
The standard has since been extended to claims arising under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA), the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA), and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act (Title VII)
Teed_NELA Amicus Brief_Final.pdf
which found that age discrimination plaintiffs were not entitled to use the motivating factor standard to prove their claims under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA). In this case, the defendant urges the Court to extend the adverse ruling in Gross to Title VII’s antiretaliation provision and “any similarly worded statute.”
The defendants allege that the two-step conditional certification procedure currently used in collective actions arising under the FLSA, Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA), and Equal Protection Act (EPA) is inconsistent with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (FRCP) and that such actions should be governed by Rule 23 of the FRCP as interpreted recently by the U.S
In re Wells Fargo W & H Litigation_NELA Amicus_Final.pdf
#AgeDiscrimination #Gross #NewsRelease
NELAPOWADAPressRelease_Web.pdf
On December 28, 2011, NELA, along with AARP and the Metropolitan Washington Employment Lawyers Association, urged the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia to reject a district court decision requiring the plaintiff (a federal employee) to prove that discrimination was the &ldquo...
Ponce Amiucs Brief_AARP MWELA NELA_Final_12-28-11.pdf