Gomez , No. 14-857, pending in the U.S. Supreme Court on appeal from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
On September 27, 2011, NELA and ten other organizations joined an amicus brief, written by the National Partnership For Women & Families, in the U.S. Supreme Court case of Coleman v. Maryland Court of Appeals (Case No. 10-1016)
NELAAmicus_Coleman_09 27 11.pdf
Brennan , No. 14-613, pending in the U.S. Supreme Court on appeal from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
14-613 tsac NELA.pdf
That’s the tally so far in this Fall’s U.S. Supreme Court term, which we noted in last week’s @NELA: News For NELA Members contains a number of cases with important consequences for employee advocates
On July 24, 2012, AARP, NELA and the Pension Rights Center filed an amicus curiae brief urging the U.S. Supreme Court to grant a petition for certiorari in Gray v
AARP NELA PRC_Amicus Brief_07 24 12.pdf
On March 6, 2020, NELA joined our Western and Eastern Pennsylvania Affiliates, AFL-CIO, National Employment Law Project, SEIU, UFCWIU, Justice At Work, and Towards Justice in filing an amicus brief in the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania on behalf of the Appellants in Heimbach v
Heimbach v. Amazon Final Docketed Brief (3.6.2020).pdf
Whether automobile service advisors are exempt from the Fair Labor Standards Act's overtime protections.
NELA and the Government Accountability Project argue in this amicus brief that the remedial nature of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX) calls for broad and inclusive application, which is necessary to prevent a crisis in the mutual fund industry, such as the one that occurred in the banking sector...
NELAAmicus_Lawson_final_08 07 2013.pdf
McCutchen , an ERISA case currently pending in the United States Supreme Court. While the underlying cause of action in this case was a tort claim, an adverse ruling in this case could have profound consequences for any employees who currently participate in employer-sponsored benefit plans
11-1285 Amici Curiae Brief (AARP) filed 10-25-12.pdf
NELA and the National Employment Law Project joined together as amicus curiae to urge the U.S. Supreme Court in Christopher v
NELA Amicus_020612.pdf
Circuit Nominee Halligan Filibustered Again, Circuit Court Hearings Continue & Votes Delayed Republican-Led House Judiciary Subcommittee Holds Hearing On Corporate Justice System House Committee Marks Up Legislation To Address NLRB Appointment Standstill White House Needs Names For Vacancies NELA Bill Chart For The 113th Congress Administrative/Executive Branch News OFCCP Offers March 22 Webinar Regarding February 28 Rescissions NLRB Seeks Supreme Court Review In Noel Canning Case NELA Participates In EEOC Roundtable On Quality Control Plan NELA Comments On Proposed Discovery Rule Changes #JudicialNominations #AFA #Publication #AttorneysFees #FederalRules #WageHour #DOL #ForcedArbitration #EEOC #LegislativePublicPolicy #CJTFA #Newsletter #NLRB #ContinuingLegalEducation #Membership #Discovery #OFCCP
On March 11, 2020, NELA and The Institute jointly filed an amicus brief with the U.S. Supreme Court in St
19-267 Nela Amicus pdf FINAL.pdf
On April 6, 2016, NELA and the National Employment Law Project filed an amicus brief in the U.S. Supreme Court in support of the Respondents in Encino Motors, LLC v. Navarro (Case No. 15-415), currently pending in the U.S. Supreme Court. Our amicus brief is focused tightly on addressing the issue of statutory construction, both as a means of fleshing out the discussion of the issue in the Respondents’ merits brief and to counter the arguments made in an amicus brief filed in this case on behalf of the Petitioners by the U.S
Encino Motors v. Navarro_NELA and NELP Amicus Brief_040616.pdf
Bouaphakeo , No. 14-1146, pending in the U.S. Supreme Court. This case concerns certification of state law class action wage and hour claims under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23, collective action claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act, and the use of representative evidence
Tyson v. Bouaphakeo_AARP, NELP, NELA Amicus Brief.pdf
By Joseph Dalia Employee Rights Advocacy Law Student Fellow The Employee Rights Advocacy Institute For Law & Policy In an 8-1 decision written by Justice Antonin Scalia, the U.S. Supreme Court on June 1, 2015 held in EEOC v
The U.S. Supreme Court issued a decision on April 29, 2015 in Mach Mining, LLC v
Tobias Attorney Fellow The Employee Rights Advocacy Institute For Law & Policy In a unanimous opinion authored by Justice Clarence Thomas, the United States Supreme Court held that warehouse workers filling amazon.com orders, do not have to be paid for time spent waiting for and passing through a rigorous security screening prior to exiting the workplace
EEOC , Case No. 13-1019, pending in the U.S. Supreme Court. The question presented in this case is: Whether and to what extent may a court enforce the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission’s duty under 42 U.S.C
13-1019 bsac Impact Fund.pdf
Symczyk, currently pending in the United States Supreme Court. Our brief was drafted by Richard J
11-1059 bsac NELA.pdf
Ball State University , currently pending in the United States Supreme Court. Our brief was drafted by Professor Michael L...The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals, in an opinion by Judge Diane Wood, affirmed summary judgment in favor of the defendant
#11-556_Vance v Ball St_NELA Amicus_Final.pdf
On Monday, April 16, 2012, the U.S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Christopher v